Tears of Themis Episode 5 (Part 3): Sins of Cynicism (III) Investigation and Trial walkthrough

Episode 5 (Part 3): Sins of Cynicism (III) puts a close to Jasmine Kenders' case, bringing justice to both her and Huey—while leaving plenty of questions about Heirson's illegal operations unsolved. In this X-Note, you finally take the long-standing case to Trial against the Baldr Legal Office.

5-31

In this stage, you need to figure out what Joey and Opaline Fish have in common. Choose Affected development.

5-33—Analysis

You need to figure out why Hans and Ian are likely accomplices in Jasmine's murder. Choose the Hans is lying. You then need to defend this conclusion with an Analysis.

5-37

5-42—Trial

In the Trial, you will defend Hugh Moss via power of attorney in the civil court against Heirson, which is represented by William Lewis of the Baldr Legal Office.

• Ian Johnson was suborned to commit perjury, and the proof is...
  • Evidence: Ian's Testimony I

• The proof that Jasmine gave Ian a loan and not a bribe is...
  • Evidence: Photo of Ian's IOU

• How do you prove that Ian's report is trusthworthy?
  • Evidence: Counter with Ian's illegal conducts

• The evidence that proves Ian's real motive for stealing Opaline fish is...
  • Evidence: Ian's Testimony II

• Losing the lawsuit harmed Jasmine, and the evidence is...
  • Evidence: Termination Contract

Check out our Tears of Themis Episode 5 (Part 2): Sins of Cynicism (II) Investigation walkthrough to complete another part of this case.